Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

Some Solutions to Special Interest Corruption

Our goal in reviewing these campaign reports is to empower you in your discussions with your friends, family, and fellow community leaders.

People_Talking_Small.jpg


So far our analyses have provided a few data points for you to use in your conversations:

  • In the House of Representatives, 47% of the campaign funds come from special interest PACs.  In the Colorado House, it's 44%.
  • In the U.S. Senate, it is only 25% - better, but still too much.
  • At the local level, it is lower for some candidates, but not much lower for incumbents.

You need to be able to make the case to your fellow concerned voters that special interest group money has corrupted our politics and we can do something about it.

We already know what many people will say in response when you tell them these stats, as we've heard most of the arguments ourselves - from candidates, lobbyists, PAC directors, union leaders, business owners, and even our family, friends, and neighbors. 

But here is the truth:

Candidates do not have to take the money,
it does corrupt our system,
and there is a lot we can do about it. 

That last part is hard for many people to believe, so we wanted to focus this update on the many proposed solutions we have seen come from a variety of groups and individuals across the country.  The proposed solutions come in the form of legislation, constitutional amendments, and immediate actions. 

 

 

Read more

Denver Municipal Candidate Questionnaire

CleanSlateNow.org is committed to getting special interest money out of politics.  We believe candidates best represent the public interest by choosing to only accept contributions from individuals.  We encourage candidates to reject contributions from political action committees, special interest groups, and corporations.

 

The questions below are meant to provide information to voters about the kinds of campaign contributions you are taking in your pursuit of public office and to provide our board with information when considering if we will endorse a candidate in your race.  Though we have traditionally publicized the names of candidates who do not take PAC and special interest group money, no single question is meant to serve as an absolute litmus test.  We seek to inform, educate, and engage you, other candidates, elected officials, and the public about issues surrounding campaign finance reform, and we hope the information you provide will help voters make up their own minds about the candidates.  Please complete and return the questionnaire by April 1, 2015.

 

Thank you for your participation, and good luck in your campaign!

 

___________________________                                          ___________________________

Name                                                                         Office Sought/District

 

___________________________                                          ___________________________

E-mail address                                                            Phone number

 

 

  1. If elected, will you actively seek to enact meaningful campaign finance reform of the following forms? 
    1. Support overturning Citizens United?            Yes      No
    2. Ban contributions in local elections from corporations, unions, and other organizations not allowed to donate to state legislative campaigns?                Yes    No
    3. Limit special interest group contributions?    Yes      No
    4. Incentivize small contributions ($150 or less) from individuals with matching funds?                     Yes      No
    5. Enact public financing of municipal elections.     Yes No

 


            Are there other reforms you would propose?

           

 

 

  1. Will you accept or have you accepted contributions from special interest groups or organizations through any means, including political committees, political action committees, or small donor committees?  (This does not include political party contributions.)

 

Yes                              No                              

 

  1. Will you accept or have you accepted contributions from Leadership PACs (a committee an elected official uses to donate to other candidates and elected officials, separate from their candidate committee)?

 

Yes                              No                              

 

  1. Will you establish or have you established your own Leadership PAC?

 

Yes                              No                               Not Sure

 

  1. Will you accept or have you already accepted contributions from large corporations (i.e., offices in more than one locality, or based out of your state with a regional or national focus)?


Yes                              No                              

 

  1. Will you accept or have you already accepted contributions from small corporations (presence in only one locality, i.e., “Mom-and-Pop Shop”)?

Yes                              No                              

 

 

  1. Will you accept or have you already accepted money from lobbyists?

Yes                              No                              

 

 

  1. Will you accept or have you already accepted money from unions?

Yes                              No                              

 

  1. Please share any thoughts you have about campaign finance reform and the role of special interest money vs. contributions from individuals in political campaigns.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. Please feel free to share any thoughts on how this information on campaign finance reform should be shared.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

___________________________                                          ___________________________

Signature                                                                                             Date

 

Completed questionnaires can be scanned and emailed to Info@CleanSlateNow.org or
mailed to CleanSlateNow.org at 8998 E 25th Dr., Denver, CO 80238.


Clean Slate Now Early Analysis of Campaign Finance Reports for Denver City Council Candidates

A frequent request we have received in the past at Clean Slate Now is for an analysis of campaign contributions in local elections, including for city, school board, and county offices.  Our first such analysis will be on the current campaigns for Denver City Council. 

In our past reports, we have analyzed campaign contributions based on how much of the money raised by current office holders were from special interest group political action committees (PACs).  The campaign finance rules in Denver, however, are quite different than the rules for Congress or State Legislature.  In most states and at the federal level, contributions are only permitted from people, PACs, party committees, or other candidates' committees.

In Denver, corporations, unions, and other organizations are allowed to donate directly to municipal candidates.  The money does not need to originate from an actual humane being.

Fortunately, only people are allowed to be candidates.

There are 42 candidates who made it on the ballot for one of the 11 City Council District seats, or the two At-Large Council seats.  Only 37 of those candidates have raised any money at this point, and seven have raised all of their money from people only, while 30 of them have already accepted money from an organization.

For our analysis, we consider all contributions from businesses, unions, PACs, and other organizations the same - as forms of special interest groups. 

Each candidate's campaign finance reports are available on the Denver Clerk and Recorder's website.

Click here for Clean Slate Now's summary of total funds raised and amounts from organizations for each council candidate.

Here are the key findings we have seen in the reports filed so far: 

Candidates for Denver City Council get a smaller percentage of their money from special interest groups than do state legislators and members of Congress.  On average, candidates for Denver City Council have raised just 13% of their campaign funds from corporations, PACs, and other organizations.  That is far below the 47% for the average member of the House of Representatives.  Even City Council incumbents have raised only 17% of their campaign funds from organizations, while 83% has come from actual people. 

 Denver_vs_other_PAC_money_report.jpg

Denver's loose restrictions on donations have allowed some people to give double the maximum.  Denver City Council candidates are not allowed to accept more than $1000 per donor if they are running in a district or $2000 if they are running for an at-large seat.  However, several candidates have raised money from both a business and the owner of the business.

This form of double dipping is one of the key problems created by allowing organizations to donate, whether through a PAC or a business.  It is not at all difficult for a donor to hide their identity by creating shell organizations with unclear names to make the contributions.  Some of the companies that donated were simply named after an address.

One candidate even received $1000 donations each from two Limited Liability Companies that share the same address and have nearly identical names.  Both were also formed in August of 2013.  Under current law, they are separate legal entities and thus allowed to donate $1000 each, even though those contributions clearly violate the spirit of the law creating the contribution limits.

Some of the organizational money incumbents receive comes from organizations regulated by the City and County of Denver.  Despite the clear conflict of interest, several incumbents have accepted major contributions from businesses that are regulated by or that do business with the City of Denver.  For example, Comcast Financial Agency has donated to several incumbents, as has the developer Forest City (as FC Facilitator LLC).  

We hope to continue monitoring these issues to determine the extent to which those contributions are shaping policymaking.  

As with any of our research, we welcome your follow up comments and questions to help guide our future research efforts.


Some Denver City Council Candidates Taking Money from Organizations, but Not All

Note: These results have been updated to include all municipal races on the May, 2015 ballot, as well as information on how much of each candidate's money they provided themselves (due to several requests for this information).  These results now also include all contributions dating back to January 1, 2012, including InKind (non-monetary) contributions.

Candidate Office Total Raised $ from Organizations  % from Organizations   % from Candidate 
Marcus GIAVANNI  Mayor   $-    $-   0% 0%
Paul FIORINO  Mayor   $-    $-   0% 0%
Seku Mayor  $-    $-   0% 0%
Michael HANCOCK  Mayor   $1,151,629.44  $343,402.51 30% 0%
           
Timothy O'BRIEN  Auditor   $43,560.00  $-   0% 46%
Chris NEVITT  Auditor   $190,089.18  $93,200.00 49% 0%
           
Debra JOHNSON  C& R   $8,591.82  $-   0% 23%
Joan POSTON  C& R   $1,000.00  $-   0% 100%
           
Jose SILVA  Council At-large   $1,595.00  $-   0% 0%
Jeffery WASHINGTON  Council At-large   $-    $-   0% 0%
Kayvan KHALATBARI  Council At-large   $14,400.00  $2,600.00 18% 56%
Deborah L. ORTEGA  Council At-large   $52,660.00  $14,500.00 28% 0%
Robin KNIECH  Council At-large   $95,397.14  $32,206.00 34% 0%
           
Rafael ESPINOZA  CD 1   $18,568.30  $-   0% 21%
Susan SHEPHERD  CD 1   $56,137.00  $14,017.00 25% 0%
           
Jeanne LABUDA CD 2   $3,680.00  $-   0% 10%
Fran COLEMAN  CD 2   $9,301.00  $-   0% 0%
Danny LOPEZ  CD 2   $-    $-   0% 0%
Kevin FLYNN  CD 2   $27,558.00  $1,350.00 5% 0%
John E. KIDD Jr.  CD 2   $14,142.71  $1,150.00 8% 24%
           
Paul LOPEZ  CD 3   $9,615.00  $4,050.00 42% 0%
           
Carolina KLEIN  CD 4   $250.00  $-   0% 100%
Kendra Alexis Valis BLACK  CD 4   $132,246.88  $10,200.00 8% 2%
Halisi VINSON  CD 4   $68,468.87  $8,336.00 12% 1%
           
Mary Beth SUSMAN  CD 5   $30,438.66  $8,643.66 28% 0%
           
Paul KASHMANN  CD 6   $53,757.14  $4,498.73 8% 7%
Liz ADAMS  CD 6   $85,902.24  $18,877.67 22% 1%
           
Jacob Hunter VIANO  CD 7   $8,250.00  $250.00 3% 2%
Anne MCGIHON  CD 7   $34,918.77  $2,000.00 6% 0%
Ian HARWICK  CD 7   $15,455.15  $1,700.00 11% 0%
Aaron GRECO  CD 7   $33,049.16  $4,300.00 13% 3%
Jolon CLARK  CD 7   $46,685.00  $6,335.00 14% 3%
Mathews ALVAREZ  CD 7   $4,900.00  $1,000.00 20% 16%
Mickki LANGSTON  CD 7   $25,212.60  $5,236.60 21% 0%
Luchia Ann BROWN  CD 7   $10,430.00  $3,720.00 36% 1%
Michael LEVY  CD 7   $150.00  $150.00 100% 0%
           
Christopher HERNDON CD 8  $75,412.00  $29,099.00 39% 0%
           
Ean TAFOYA  CD 9   $3,265.00  $-   0% 0%
Michael BORCHERDING  CD 9   $9,595.00  $150.00 2% 52%
Albus BROOKS  CD 9   $163,830.92  $58,707.55 36% 1%
           
Travis LEIKER  CD 10   $21,515.50  $-   0% 3%
Chris Cornell WEDOR  CD 10   $32,709.70  $379.70 1% 67%
Chris CHIARI  CD 10   $59,650.00  $1,300.00 2% 84%
Wayne NEW  CD 10   $99,611.60  $3,140.00 3% 4%
Anna JONES  CD 10   $58,217.50  $7,147.00 12% 0%
           
Tim CAMARILLO  CD 11   $-    $-   0% 0%
Stacie GILMORE  CD 11   $32,873.11  $1,250.00 4% 19%
Sean BRADLEY  CD 11   $31,905.00  $2,550.00 8% 0%
Shelli BROWN  CD 11   $18,869.00  $2,600.00 14% 0%
Tea SCHOOK  CD 11   $23,842.52  $4,450.00 19% 1%

Are Colorado Legislators as PAC Dependent as Members of Congress?

After countless volunteer and staff hours, Clean Slate Now has finally been able to complete our initial analysis of special interest group contributions to the state legislators here in Colorado.

We want to make sure these results are easily comparable with our recent report on special interest contributions to Congress, so we focused on the most recent election cycle.  For the Colorado House, we analyze contributions made in 2013 and 2014.  For the Colorado Senate, we analyze contributions made in 2011 through 2014, as Colorado Senators have four-year terms.

Before we get to the results, we need to highlight that Colorado candidates have to follow different rules than Congressional candidates.  The contribution limits are much lower.  For an individual, the limit is $400 per election cycle instead as compared with $5200 for candidates for Congress.

The contribution limit for political committees (Colorado's name for political action committees (PACs)) is also $400, but Colorado law also allows special interest groups to form Small Donor Committees (SDCs), which can contribute as much as $2000 per candidate per election cycle, but can only accept contributions of $50 or less.

Below are key findings, and some lessons learned, from our review of PAC contribution to current members of the Colorado legislature.

Click here to see the results for each member of the Colorado legislature.


Similar Dependence on PACs as Members of Congress
 

When compared to members of the United States House of Representatives, Colorado State Representatives accepted a slightly lower percentage of their campaign funds from special interest group PACs - 44% for Colorado State Representatives as compared with 47% for U.S. Representatives.

March_2015_PAC_Report_Pct_from_House.jpg

 

The percentage of campaign funds coming from PACs for State Senators are much higher than for U.S. Senators.  Colorado State Senators relied on PACs for 37% of their campaign funds, whereas U.S. Senators relied on PACs for only 25% of their funds.

March_2015_PAC_Report_Pct_from_Senate_PACs.jpg

 


Importance Differences Between Colorado Representatives and Colorado Senators

While Colorado State Senators relied on PACs for a greater percentage of their campaign funds than U.S. Senators, they are actually less dependent on PACs than their counterparts in the Colorado House.  

Each of the past two years, Colorado's Representatives raised on average $12,056 from PACs.  Colorado's state Senators raised $9,419 on average from PACs each of the past four years.

In percentage terms, 37% of campaign funds for State Senators came from PACs whereas 44% of campaign funds for State Representatives came from PACs.

 

No-PAC Candidates in the Colorado Legislature

Just like in Congress, there are several members of the Colorado legislature who refuse all PAC money:

Representative Dan Pabon
Representative Lois Court
Senator Irene Aguilar
Senator Michael Johnston

 

Small Donor Committees are a key avenue for special interest groups to buy influence.  If not for the larger contribution limits allowed to small donor committees, Colorado legislators likely would be far less reliant on special interest group PAC money.  In the Colorado House, 58% of the PAC contributions came from SDCs.  In the Colorado Senate, a similar 60% of PAC contributions came from SDCs. 

If SDCs did not exist, Colorado legislators would depend far more on campaign contributions from their constituents and other individuals.

March_2015_PAC_Report_Pct_from_SDCs.jpg

 

 

Key Lessons Learned for Clean Slate Now:

  1. Reliance on PACs for campaign funds is not unique to Congress.  We expected that Colorado state legislators would also rely on PAC money to fund their campaigns, but we did not necessarily know how important it would or would not be.  Now we know that state legislators are not much different than Members of Congress when it comes to how much of their campaign funds come from PACs: much of the money, but not a majority, comes from special interest group PACs.

  2. Asking candidates to say no to PAC money persuades some, and candidates for state legislature have won without PAC money.  Representatives Lois Court and Dan Pabon were both elected after winning competitive campaigns.  In both of their races, they refused special interest PAC money.  They have also remained committed to staying PAC free even after being elected.  While Senators Irene Aguilar and Michael Johnston first entered office as the result of vacancy committee appointments, both have also remained committed to turning down special interest group PAC money in their reelection campaign fundraising. 

  3. Some legislators need help sticking with a no-PAC commitment.  Three other Colorado legislators were elected after committing to turn down PAC money, but have not maintained their status as no-PAC candidates.  Just like most of us need help to stick to a healthy diet, some of our elected officials need help sticking to the commitments they make to voters.

  4. Candidates are willing to say no to PAC money, but need to know how to win without it.  Several of the current members of the Colorado legislature won their first races without PAC money.  Some remained PAC-free after taking office, while others gave into the pressure to take the easy money PACs offer.  The record in Colorado, though, clearly shows that candidates can and do win without relying on PAC money.  It is not the choice made by the majority of legislators, but it could be.


This is our first look at PAC contributions to elected officials at the state level.  What else would you like to know that we could include in our future research?  What do you think of these results?


Donate Now Join Us Volunteer Today